Intellectual Property

Overview
News
Articles
Links

Customs and Border Protection is responsible for preventing merchandise that infringes U.S. copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights from entering the country. Customs is also responsible for the enforcement of exclusion ordered issued by the International Trade Commission in Section 337 cases, which generally focus on the enforcement of patent rights.

Trademark Issues

Importers of branded merchandise should be aware that the law prohibits the importation of merchandise bearing a U.S. trademark without the permission of the trademark owner. Thus, importers should be prepared to show authorization from the rights holder. Absent permission, Customs can seize the infringing goods. While Customs can seize any infringing goods, its primary focus is on the interdiction of counterfeit goods. Counterfeit goods are products that bear a mark that copies or simulates a registered trademark. Because counterfeiting is illegal activity, the counterfeited products are often of inferior quality and may pose a risk to health and safety.

Copyrights

Customs also has the power to exclude "piratical" copies of products covered by copyright such as books, music, videos, software, and video games. A piratical copy is one that is produced without the authorization of the copyright holder. Because products imported into the U.S. often include a copyrightable elements (e.g., written instructions, packaging artwork, etc.), copyrights may be a viable alternative to trademark enforcement for companies seeking to prevent the entry of "knock-off products."

Gray Market Goods

It is often possible to find desirable products on sale outside the United States at discounted prices. This creates the possibility that goods will be imported through unauthorized channels. Such goods are called "gray market" or "parallel imports." Because these are genuine products, gray market goods are admissible provided they are not materially different from the products offered for sale in the U.S. As a result, parallel importers must be careful to recognize the differences between their imports and the products authorized for sale in the U.S. Differences such as foreign language labeling, packaging, and formulation may provide a sufficient basis for Customs to exclude the merchandise. Further, companies can seek so-called "Lever Brother Protection" from parallel imports. When granted, Lever Brother Protection requires that parallel imports be labeled as such prior to release.

Recordation

Customs and Border Protection focuses its enforcement efforts on trademarks, copyrights, and trade dress recorded via its electronic system. Recordation is a relatively simple and inexpensive step that provides significant benefits. Recordation publishes the claim for protection to Customs personnel throughout the country and alerts them to the possibility that infringing merchandise is being presented for entry. Recordation should be part of a rights holder's larger strategy of working with Customs to protect its investment in intellectual property.

Section 337

Determining whether a product infringes upon a U.S. patent is often requires the application of complex legal and technical knowledge. Because of the complexity of the issues, the enforcement of patent rights at the border is entrusted to the U.S. International Trade Commission, which has staff attorneys and Administrative Law Judges dedicated to reviewing claims made before the agency. If infringement is found, the ITC can order that the merchandise be excluded from the United States. It falls to Customs and Border Protection to enforce those orders.

Our Role

Barnes/Richardson lawyers have assisted clients with all aspects of the border enforcement of intellectual property law including:

                  Recording trademarks
                  Recording copyrights
                  Developing brand protection materials for training Customs personnel
                  Responding to CBP seizure notices
                  Seeking rulings from CBP to confirm compliance with 337 exclusion orders

Should you have questions or concerns regarding the importation or exclusion of merchandise subject to intellectual property protection, please contact a Barnes/Richardson lawyer.

Apr. 12, 2024: Using French and British English to Classify Imports
Mar. 22, 2024: End -User Restrictions for OFAC SDN Listed Entities
Mar. 22, 2023: DHS Gets a Budget Boost for Combating Forced Labor
Feb. 13, 2024: Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity Implemented
Feb. 12, 2024: The 2018 Trade War Has Been an Employment Failure
Feb. 9, 2024: New Export Control Know-Your-Customer (KYC) Requirements for IaaS Providers
Feb. 2, 2024: Court Clarifies What Qualifies as a "Basket Provision"
Feb. 1, 2024: Fine Makes Clear That the FTC is Serious About Made in USA
Jan. 30, 2024: Sheffield Issues Guide for the Solar or EV Battery Sectors
Jan. 24, 2024: Importer Avoids 7% Surprise on Agency Arrangement
Jan. 19, 2024: BIS's Fast-Track to Resolving Voluntary Self-Disclosure
Jan. 16, 2024: Drug Cartel Linked to $10.4 million Customs Fraud Penalty
Jan. 8, 2024: Customs Publicizes UFLPA Detention Addendum
Dec. 19, 2023: US and EU Appear to Have Trade Truce Through March 2025
Dec. 19, 2023: House Select Committee Advocates Trade Changes with China
Dec. 14, 2023: A U.S.-Taiwan Free Trade Agreement is Very Unlikely
Dec. 5, 2023: Global Arrangement On Sustainable Steel And Aluminum Negotiations Failed, Maybe
Nov. 28, 2023: Key Senators Push to Keep China Tariffs
Nov. 8, 2023: Focus on AGOA Renewal as GSP Appears to Languish
Oct. 24, 2023: Commerce Continues to Issue Semiconductor Restrictions in Bid to Protect Supply Chains
Oct. 13, 2023: Understanding the Bureau of Industry and Security's Entity List
Oct. 11, 2023: 49 Entities Additions to BIS for Circumvention of Integrated Circuits to Russia
Oct. 10, 2023: Semiconductor Rule Finalized by Commerce
Sep 27, 2023: U.S. Companies in China are Feeling Pessimistic and are Acting on the Feeling
Aug. 18, 2023: Two CIT Decisions Clarify Some (Potential) Importer Responsibilities
Jun. 23, 2023: SHU Publishes "Desk-Based" Forced Labor Research Strategies
Jun. 15, 2023: Congress Seeks Industry Input Regarding Updates Need to Modernize U.S. Customs Laws
Apr. 20, 2023: Seagate's $300 million Export and Foreign Direct Products Rule Violation
Apr. 10, 2023: UFLPA Best Business Practices
Apr. 10, 2023: As Exemplified by Microsoft's Sanctions and Export Controls – You can't Pass off Compliance to Third Parties
Feb. 24, 2023: The CHIPS Act and a Long-term Vision for America's Technological Leadership
Nov. 29, 2022: China PNTR Removal Recommendation
Jul. 13, 2021: USITC Investigating Skechers and Hobby Lobby for Importing Fake Crocs
May 4, 2021: Member of Congress Press for Section 301 Exclusions
Mar. 23, 2021: ITC Limited Exclusion Order in LG Battery Dispute Awaits Presidential Action
January 15, 2020: US-China Reach "Phase One" Agreement
Dec. 10, 2019: House Announces USMCA Agreement
July 8, 2019: USTR Issues More Section 301 Exclusions
May 30, 2019: Revisiting First Sale as a Basis for Declaring Customs Value as a Strategy to Reduce Duty Obligations under Section 301
February 25, 2019: President Trump Delays Deadline for 301 Tariff Increase
October 2, 2018: USTR Releases Fact Sheets about USMC Trade Agreement
September 25: China Imposes Another Round of Retaliatory Tariffs
June 22, 2018: USTR Announces Tariffs on Retaliatory Section 301 Tariffs on Chinese Products
April 4, 2018: USTR Publishes Proposed List of Products Subject to Section 301 Tariffs
March 22, 2018: USTR Office Publishes Section 301 Report on Chinese IP, Data Transfer Policies and Practices
August 22, 2017: USTR Initiates Section 301 Investigation of Chinese IP Policy
March 6, 2015: USTR Releases Report on Notorious Markets

View Archive

Jun. 2, 2023: BRC and Attorneys Ranked in 2023 Chambers Guide
April 01, 2014: BRC Partner David Forgue Speaks at ITCC Workshop
February 5, 2013: Detentions, Exclusions, and Customs Protests
By: Lawrence M. Friedman
May-June 2012: White House International Trade Initiatives
By: David G. Forgue

U.S. Customs & Border Protection Seizure Information